- Sen. Jerry Moran opposes rewarding Putin’s aggression
- Warns against weak Ukraine security guarantees
- Voices concern alongside fellow Republican senators
The Kansas congressional delegation's most vocal opponent of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Moran, contended that the world would become more dangerous if President Donald Trump supported a compromise that catered to Putin's demands. This invasion of Ukraine was started by Russia in 2022.
“Lasting peace will be achieved when the costs of continuing the war in Ukraine are unsustainable for Russia, not by acceding to Vladimir Putin’s demands,”
Moran said.
Following conversations with Russian officials, Trump declared his support for a 28-point plan put forth by White House envoy Steve Witkoff. The proposal's concessions to Russia, which included giving up Ukrainian territory, were condemned by several American politicians. The plan was also criticized for failing to recognize other Ukrainian security interests and for including a guarantee that Ukraine could not join NATO.
“As negotiations move forward,”
Moran said,
“the administration must make certain Ukraine is equipped with the tools needed to defend its people and territory against ongoing aggression and demand meaningful, enduring security guarantees for Kyiv.”
Long-range missiles would "help level the battlefield as negotiations hopefully move forward," according to Moran, who stated in October that the US should provide Ukraine with these weapons. Trump declined to approve the transfer of cruise missiles to Ukraine.
In July, Moran claimed that continuing to provide Ukraine with weapons and support would be a sign of weakness to the rest of the globe.
What specific security guarantees does Senator Moran propose for Ukraine?
Furnishing Ukraine with advanced protective artillery, similar to long- range perfection strike systems like American- made Tomahawk voyage dumdums, to strengthen its military capabilities and discourage further Russian conflict. icing sustained U.S. service and profitable support that makes the durability of war expensive and unsustainable for Russia.
Establishing a frame of security guarantees that could involve NATO members or interested mates for an exemplary response, military or profitable, should Russia attack Ukraine again. Real commitment from the U.S. and abettors to stand shoulder to shoulder with Ukraine, transferring a clear communication to adversaries that popular nations will defend their sovereignty.
Maintaining and enhancing profitable warrants on Russia to choke off coffers fueling the war trouble. Developing a comprehensive strategy that supports a Ukrainian palm and deters unborn aggression, buttressing Ukrainian sovereignty and indigenous stability.