header-image

How the No Tax on Tips Act Could Change Taxation of Tipped Income in the US

In US Senate News by Newsroom October 3, 2025

How the No Tax on Tips Act Could Change Taxation of Tipped Income in the US

Credit: CNN

The US Senate recently passed the No Tax on Tips Act in a move that caught many by surprise but was welcomed by tipped workers and business groups alike. This bipartisan legislation exempts tips up to a $25,000 cap from federal income tax for eligible workers, aiming to provide financial relief to large numbers of Americans who rely on gratuities as a key part of their income. The law also limits eligibility based on income thresholds and focuses on cash tips reported for payroll withholding purposes. 

Background: The Importance of Tipped Income in America

Tipped workers form a substantial portion of the US workforce, especially in industries like restaurants, hospitality, and personal services. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, millions of Americans earn a significant part of their wages through tips, supplementing often modest base salaries. However, under current tax rules, these tips are considered taxable income, requiring workers to pay federal income taxes on them.

For many tipped employees, this taxation reduces take-home pay and complicates financial planning, especially for those earning lower wages overall. The No Tax on Tips Act emerged from this ongoing discussion about the fairness of taxing tips and how best to support service industry workers ensuring they receive adequate net earnings.

Legislative Journey: Bipartisan Support and Senate Passage

The No Tax on Tips Act was introduced in January 2025 by Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) with bipartisan co-sponsors including Senators Jacky Rosen and Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada. Nevada’s prominence in tipped occupations having the highest per capita tipped worker population gave particular impetus for the bill.

In a rare unanimous consent vote in May 2025, the Senate passed the bill without objection. Senator Rosen, highlighting her state’s reliance on tipped labor, described the legislation as delivering "immediate financial relief for countless hard-working families." The bill’s swift passage reflected growing consensus around supporting tipped workers; however, it faced critical examination from labor advocates and tax policy experts once it moved to the House of Representatives.

Key Provisions of the No Tax on Tips Act

The law offers a tax deduction up to $25,000 on tip income earned by eligible workers, effectively exempting those earnings from federal income tax. This cap is inflation-indexed, potentially increasing over time to keep pace with economic changes.

To qualify, workers must:

  • Receive cash tips that are fully reported to employers for payroll withholding.
  • Earn $160,000 or less annually (adjusted for inflation in future years).
  • Belong to occupations where tip income is customary, such as waitstaff, bartenders, chauffeurs, and hospitality employees.

Notably, the tax break targets only cash tips reported for payroll purposes, excluding other forms of gratuities. This framework is designed to ensure transparency while preventing abuse or unreported income.

Implications for Tipped Workers and Employers

For many tipped employees, the act promises increased take-home pay, reducing the tax burden that can be particularly heavy on lower and middle-income workers who rely on tips as a significant income source.

Employers, especially in the restaurant and hospitality sectors, have welcomed the legislation. The National Restaurant Association publicly supported the bill, emphasizing its potential to provide economic stability for workers who often experience fluctuating incomes and financial insecurity.

The law’s emphasis on reported cash tips also encourages formal documentation of gratuities, which may improve overall tax compliance transparency. In this way, the legislation aims to reduce underreporting and strengthen payment accuracy.

Criticism and Concerns

Despite broad political support, the No Tax on Tips Act has faced criticism from labor advocates and tax experts. Some argue that the financial benefit is marginal for many tipped workers who do not earn enough to owe federal taxes on their total income. The tax deduction might help a fraction of tipped workers with higher earnings but leaves others with negligible gains.

Another concern involves the potential for unintended employer behavior. Critics warn that some employers might reclassify wages as tips to take advantage of tax breaks, reducing base pay under covert schemes. This would undermine efforts to improve wage fairness and might exacerbate wage uncertainty among workers.

Labor advocates also contend that the focus on tips perpetuates a two-tier pay system, where workers rely heavily on variable gratuities rather than stable hourly wages. They advocate for policies promoting higher base pay with tips as supplemental income, aligning with ongoing debates around minimum wage reforms and economic equity.

Historical and Political Context

The tax exemption on tips was a notable issue during the 2024 presidential election campaign. Both President Donald Trump and then-Vice President Kamala Harris addressed it in their platforms, reflecting bipartisan recognition of the importance of measures to alleviate financial pressures on tipped workers.

The No Tax on Tips Act thus fulfills a campaign promise of the Trump administration, while also incorporating bipartisan input that helped move it through Congress. This confluence of political interests underscores the contemporary relevance of tax policy reforms tailored to the realities of working Americans.

Comparison with Other Tipped Income Policies Globally

Internationally, the treatment of tips varies significantly. In many European countries, tips are less commonly taxed, and service charges or higher regulated wages compensate workers. The United States’ approach to taxing tips has been historically unique, partly due to its complex mix of federal and state tax rules.

Belgium, for example, has strict rules around firearm ownership but generally integrates taxes into contained systems reflecting social safety nets. Similarly, in countries with comprehensive social welfare, the reliance on tips tends to be less critical than in the US.

The No Tax on Tips Act aligns the US tax treatment more closely with some global norms that mitigate tax burdens on gratuities, potentially setting a precedent for future reforms.

Economic Implications and Future Outlook

Economists suggest that removing taxes on tips could marginally increase consumer spending by boosting disposable income for millions of workers. However, the overall effect on federal revenue will depend on uptake, inflation adjustments, and changes in wage reporting.

The act may encourage greater formalization of tip reporting, enhancing transparency in the labor market. Its long-term success, however, will hinge on accompanying policies that guarantee fair wages and protections for tipped workers.

Future legislative efforts may push for complementary reforms addressing the structural issues in tipped labor, including minimum wage debates and employment benefits.

The US Senate’s passage of the No Tax on Tips Act represents a landmark in taxpayer relief specifically targeted at tipped workers. By exempting up to $25,000 of recorded tip income from federal taxes for those earning under set thresholds, the legislation seeks to increase fairness and financial stability for millions in the service industries.

While supporters hail it as a practical win for working families, critics caution about limited scope and possible employer abuses. The law’s impact will unfold as it proceeds through the legislative process and finds real-world application, posing significant questions about how best to support a vital but often vulnerable workforce.

Ultimately, the No Tax on Tips Act highlights the ongoing balancing act in US labor and tax policy between economic relief, fairness, and ensuring sustainable employment standards.