Young Democrat proposes cognitive tests for Congress
Summary
- Dem Rep. Perez wants cognitive tests for Congress.
- Tests target aging members’ mental fitness.
- The proposal aims for transparency, public trust.
- Amendment attached to funding bill, voted down.
- Office of Congressional Conduct to create standards.
Voters have expressed concerns about the age of
lawmakers to Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA), a two-term Democrat who won a
seat that Trump won twice.
“What I’ve heard from my neighbors, my community
is this idea that this place is being run by a bunch of staffers,” the
36-year-old told Axios. “
And we’re seeing a very real decline in confidence in
Congress.
Gluesenkamp Perez responded by proposing an amendment to the appropriations bill that
requires the Office of Congressional Conduct to develop a standard to evaluate
members “ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant
irreversible cognitive impairment.” The amendment would require funding
for congressional operations.
Arriving at the U.S. Capitol for a series of
votes is Representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA). She is putting forward
fresh ideas to address the issue of an aging Congress.
Subcommittee chairman David Valadao (R-CA)
stated that elections are the appropriate gauge, but that there is “a lot
of concern with some of our colleagues sometimes when we see some of their
comments,” which is why the amendment failed to pass during a markup.
“It’s not a comfortable thing to think
about time being irreversible and how our lives change, but [being] willing to
have these honest, candid, and difficult conversations is [being] real respect
for our communities and the body here,”
Gluesenkamp Perez told Axios.
The subject of whether senior politicians can
continue to do their duties has been addressed by Congress, especially by
Democrats. The House Oversight & Accountability Committee’s top Democrat,
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), passed away earlier this year following a diagnosis
of esophageal cancer last year.
Following President Donald Trump’s joint speech
to Congress in March, freshman Democrat Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-TX) passed
away. Turner had a history of cancer and was 70 years old.
Additionally, Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) passed
away earlier this year following a protracted fight with cancer. Last year,
Grijalva missed the most votes in the House of Representatives.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein passed away in office at
the age of 89 during the last Congress after being repeatedly questioned about
her mental health.
The most obvious example was probably during
former President Joe Biden’s disastrous one-and-only debate with Trump in June
of last year. Biden appeared weak, fumbled over his words, and frequently
stopped speaking in the middle of sentences. Less than a month after the
debate, Biden, then 81, resigned, and his vice president Kamala Harris emerged
as the Democratic presidential nominee before losing to Trump.
Other Democrats have also questioned their
mental health, including Rep. David Scott (D-GA) and Del. Eleanor Holmes, the
nonvoting representative for Washington, D.C., in Congress.
What are the main arguments for and against
cognitive testing of Congress members?
Cognitive tests can help ensure that elected
officials, especially aging members, are mentally capable of performing the
demanding duties of office without impairment. This helps protect the integrity
of government decision-making on critical issues.
Proponents argue that voters deserve
transparency about the cognitive health of lawmakers making major decisions
about policy, budgets, and national security. Testing provides a
straightforward way to inform the public without necessarily leading to removal
from office.
Routine cognitive assessments can identify early
signs of decline, allowing intervention or adjustments in responsibilities
before serious issues arise.